Pubdate: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 Source: Chronicle, The (Duke U, NC Edu) Copyright: 2009 Duke Student Publishing Company Contact: http://www.dukechronicle.com/contactus/ Website: http://www.dukechronicle.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2269 Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n846/a07.html Author: Shreyan Sen FIGHT DRUG CARTELS THROUGH LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA Referring to the legalization of marijuana and its effect on drug cartels in his Sept. 3 column "An inconvenient truth," Vikram Srinivasan reminds us "that drugs are illegal now and any discussion of their ethics must be grounded in the universe of current realities and consequences." That said, Srinivasan recommends we change said "current realit[y]" by curtailing private drug use. Let us take a moment, however, to actually consider the current reality. We have violent drug cartels, and these cartels exist because of two reasons: 1) a powerful American appetite for marijuana, and 2) a refusal to legalize and regulate marijuana. If we are to stop the drug cartels, we must change one of these causal circumstances. Which event is better grounded in reality: millions of people suddenly growing a conscience and dropping their drug habits, or a government legalizing and regulating marijuana? Is one option not a complete fantasy? Really, Srinivasan's solution does nothing to actually stop the drug cartels. Abstaining from marijuana use on moral grounds may negate any personal responsibility for the drug wars, but it will not stop them. If we are concerned about the lives of our southern neighbors, we should focus more on the drug wars themselves than any dubious connections we may or may not have to them. The legalization and thus legitimization of marijuana and its sources would be several million times more effective in this respect than any recommendations to limit recreational drug use. While personal ethics are undoubtedly important, if we really want to prevent "another dead Latin American child" perhaps we should focus on intelligent (and realistic) policy changes rather than debate personal morality and our connections to aforementioned dead and dying. Al Capone was born out of prohibition, and it was a change in public policy (the re-legalization of alcohol) that put him and his ilk out of business, not the morality of consumers. Shreyan Sen Trinity '12 - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake