Pubdate: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 Source: Jasper Booster (CN AB) Copyright: 2004 The Jasper Booster Contact: http://www.jasperbooster.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/788 Author: Alan Randell MERRIFIELD'S POT POLICY QUESTIONED Jasper Booster - I have a few questions for MP Rob Merrifield about his evident support for drug prohibition, a program he should know was initiated during the first half of the 20th century as a means of persecuting and "controlling" blacks (marijuana) and Chinese (opium). 1. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why, then, are tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those who prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we ban all harmful drugs? 2. Is it not true that, far from protecting users from harm, banning a drug harms them much more than would otherwise be the case because it cuts them off from access to drugs of known potency and purity? Weren't thousands of Americans poisoned or blinded by adulterated alcohol during Prohibition. Didn't the problems vanish when alcohol was legalized again? 3. Doesn't drug prohibition CAUSE street-level drug dealing? Why should anyone buy drugs in the street if the corner store sells them? 4. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate narcotics." Why, then, ban heroin? 5. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on the prohibition of alcohol? 6. Is it not true that if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the power of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all, Prohibition created Al Capone, not the other way around. 7. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage and steal no more hydro than the average tomato grow operation? For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers today than there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks, incarcerate Japanese Canadians or gas Jews. In short, drugs are highly useful, functional and beneficial scapegoats. They provide a ruling class with fig leaves to place over the unsightly social ills that are endemic to the social system over which they preside and they give the general public a focus for blame in which a chemical 'bogeyman,' or the 'deviants' who ingest it, are the root cause for a wide array of complex social problems. - -Alan Randell, Victoria, B.C. - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart