Pubdate: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 Source: Langley Advance (CN BC) Copyright: 2002 Lower Mainland Publishing Group Inc. Contact: http://www.langleyadvance.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1248 Author: Alan Randell DARE: OLDER KIDS ASK QUESTIONS Dear Editor, Re Volunteers: Cop dads DARE to lend a hand, Oct. 22, Langley Advance News. I suspect the cops do not attempt to present their ineffectual, anti-drug DARE claptrap to kids older than Grade 6 or so, because older kids might ask tough questions like these: 1. Why are you presenting the program, and not someone who really knows about drugs, such as a user or physician? 2. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms implies that citizens have the right to pursue their own form of happiness, so long as they harm no one else. Thus it seems Canadians have the right to ingest any drug, however harmful. Why do you feel the government has the right to punish individuals for what they choose to ingest into their own bodies and jail those who supply them? (By "harm," I don't mean causing anguish to friends and family, otherwise we would jail all divorcing parents along with any kid who didn't do his or her homework. I mean direct, physical harm.) 3. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why then are tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those who prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we ban all harmful drugs? 4. Is it not true that, far from protecting users from harm, banning a drug harms them much more than would otherwise be the case, because it cuts them off from access to drugs of known potency and purity? Weren't thousands of Americans poisoned or blinded by adulterated alcohol during Prohibition. Didn't the problems vanish when alcohol was legalized again? 5. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate narcotics." Why, then, ban heroin? 6. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on the prohibition of alcohol? 7. Is it not true that, if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the power of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all, Prohibition created Al Capone, not the other way around. 8. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage, and steal no more hydro than the average tomato grow operation? For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers today than there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks, incarcerate Japanese Canadians, or gas Jews. Alan Randell Victoria - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens