Pubdate: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 Source: Herald, The (WA) Copyright: 2001 The Daily Herald Co. Contact: http://www.heraldnet.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/190 Author: MATINA VOURGOURAKIS, Everett Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n482/a03.html?4568 LAWS SHOULD GIVE PROTECTION TO PUBLIC I am writing in response to the March 19 letter by Mr. Gregory Lemke ("Property forfeitures: Don't give the drug dealers chance to profit from wrong"). Is he unaware that in this country we are presumed innocent until proven guilty? Allowing police to confiscate the property of anyone suspected of a crime would be giving too much power to law enforcement unit. Law enforcement means upholding the laws of this country, which are written to protect its citizens. We already have stories in the papers every day of corrupt police. Why would he think that giving them that type of power would not open us up to more abuse? I can predict his response already: if you are not a criminal, you have nothing to fear. Does he believe that there are never innocent people accused of crimes? What would stop a jealous neighbor from reporting that you are growing marijuana in your house? Under his plan, the police could therefore seize your house and keep it before you are even convicted of anything. Already, we have more of our citizens in jail than other industrialized countries in the world and still we can't stop the drugs from being sold. It's time to try a new solution to the drug problem, like finding out why people continue to use drugs even after going through the DARE program - or trying to get people off drugs and give them some hope in life. Or trying to truly rehabilitate prisoners and give them a trade for when they get out of prison, instead of giving them no other option than to return to the ways of making money that ended them up in jail to begin with. Taking away more of our rights will not help any but those already in power. MATINA VOURGOURAKIS Everett - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart